Goldsmith & Goldsmith, LLP
New York
212-421-5500
New Jersey
201-429-7892
Se Habla Español
As the situation with the COVID-19 virus continues, we want you to know that we are available to our clients. We are conducting phone and via conferencing meetings. We are open and will continue to represent you in these uncertain times. Do not hesitate to contact us with any questions, concerns or requests for information.

Medical Malpractice
Attorneys And Trained Medical
Professionals

Trust our firm to deliver exceptional client service no matter how complex your medical malpractice case is.

Medical Malpractice
Attorneys And Trained
Medical
Professionals

Trust our firm to deliver exceptional client service no matter how complex your medical malpractice case is.

Cases rejected by other firms

On Behalf of | Mar 8, 2022 | Firm News

Why would one law firm look at a case rejected by another law firm? The answer is simple—we are not infallible—but more importantly most law firms lack the experience and resources to properly evaluate a potential claim.

One particular case comes to mind. One Monday morning I received a call from another attorney. The facts involved a 30-year-old woman with brain damage after open heart surgery. Her case had been reviewed by two firms and two anesthesiologists, all of whom found no liability. The Statute of Limitations would run that Friday. Would I look at the case? They had all of the records.

The first reaction: The Statute of Limitations runs that Friday.

The second reaction, young woman with brain damage and a heart surgery case reviewed by anesthesiologists. This is wrong, it should have been reviewed by a heart surgeon, and we need the records immediately.

The records were delivered to our office that Monday afternoon. I reviewed them that evening and called a heart surgeon that I knew. We reviewed the facts together, and he told me to be in his office at 7AM the next morning as he had surgery scheduled for 10AM. There in his office, we reviewed the records together and he told me what he felt were the errors in the work carried out by the surgeon. He agreed to be of assistance.

On that Wednesday I was able to meet and assess the client. Wednesday afternoon the complaint was drafted and on Thursday it was filed in Court protecting the Statute of Limitations. The case settled two years later for over $3million.

The attorney had the records, I had free time, I had access to a heart surgeon and all the factors that should not have worked, in this case worked.

Under the right circumstances we will take a second look when a case has been turned down by another firm.